tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13840519.post115004061233814401..comments2024-03-27T03:32:53.817-05:00Comments on Euangelion: Current projectMichael F. Birdhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09713482855679578651noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13840519.post-1150117022499649712006-06-12T07:57:00.000-05:002006-06-12T07:57:00.000-05:00yeah, I'm not sure how you condense this into 25 m...yeah, I'm not sure how you condense this into 25 min!<BR/><BR/>Sounds great Mike. I think one of the huge weaknesses in scholarship is a certain reductionism in matters like this. D. C. Sim is a good example in Matt studies--arguing that Matt is basically writing to counter Paul or Pauline Xianity. But if you fail to begin by explaining the universal or nearly universal connections (i.e., "Gospel," Jesus as Lord, messianic fulfillment of OT, etc) you're bound to overstate the differences and reduce everything to conflict. <BR/><BR/>Perhaps modern day nations with ongoing baptist, presbyterian, and charismatic missions might be a good analogy here?J. B. Hoodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17074055343675084879noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13840519.post-1150072952422976052006-06-11T19:42:00.000-05:002006-06-11T19:42:00.000-05:00Sounds like a great paper, but it seems like there...Sounds like a great paper, but it seems like there would be enough material on this topic for an entire monograph.<BR/>crbChris Brunohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05714876342567159822noreply@blogger.com