tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13840519.post115805053392581168..comments2024-03-27T03:32:53.817-05:00Comments on Euangelion: The Gospel of Justification?Michael F. Birdhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09713482855679578651noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13840519.post-1158121867239453612006-09-12T23:31:00.000-05:002006-09-12T23:31:00.000-05:00Apparently my spelling of Justification isn't near...Apparently my spelling of Justification isn't nearly as nuanced as my articulation of the doctrine. Oooops... (blush)Nate Mihelishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17702094516356506877noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13840519.post-1158121741973099312006-09-12T23:29:00.000-05:002006-09-12T23:29:00.000-05:00Mike,I think at the popular level a good deal of t...Mike,<BR/><BR/>I think at the popular level a good deal of this sort of speech stems from the promulgation of Jerry Bridges' books. I'm not bashing Bridges, but his priority of imputation/justification in relation to the gospel is pretty explicit. <BR/><BR/>This is the sort of reformed theology that I initially cut my teeth on about 5 yrs back. Since then my understanding of both Gospel and Juatification has become (and is becoming more nuanced). Drawing from the npp, I've embraced the needed caution against one for one correpondence between Torah Centered Jewish Christians and 16th (or 20th)century Rome. What contemporary challenges would you suggest should be met head on with this "robust theological expression of the Gospel" (that's excellent language)? <BR/><BR/>NateNate Mihelishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17702094516356506877noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13840519.post-1158079632515155262006-09-12T11:47:00.000-05:002006-09-12T11:47:00.000-05:00"A condition for eschatological vindication"...som..."A condition for eschatological vindication"...somebody's been reading their Gathercole:)Nick Nowalkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16801028847236395038noreply@blogger.com