tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13840519.post2011735725522090612..comments2024-03-27T03:32:53.817-05:00Comments on Euangelion: Revelation Bonanza - Part 3: Gospel and ApocalypseMichael F. Birdhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09713482855679578651noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13840519.post-85881605479228186312009-01-16T22:46:00.000-06:002009-01-16T22:46:00.000-06:00"Both are clearly in the Johannine 'school' (if su..."Both are clearly in the Johannine 'school' (if such a thing existed) . . ."<BR/><BR/>I think you need to remove the word "clearly." Your parenthetical comment already casts doubt on its clarity. I personally think it's a stretch to connect the two anyway.Patrick G. McCulloughhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10407715419414104172noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13840519.post-84621916948118869632009-01-16T20:11:00.000-06:002009-01-16T20:11:00.000-06:00Michael,I see you are coming to the light! :)Jorg ...Michael,<BR/><BR/>I see you are coming to the light! :)<BR/><BR/>Jorg Frey's work is outstanding. He is judicious and comprehensive. There are few works give such a detailed assessment of the relationship between these two books.<BR/><BR/>I would say, however, that I am not sure one can say that the FG could only be viewed as realized eschatology. Likewise, I am not sure that we could say that Revelation omits any sense of realized eschatology. Clearly, they are not the same and the eschatological distinctions do exist, but I wonder if these differences have overshadowed the similarities.<BR/><BR/>Thanks for all that you do, my friend. It is good to be back on the web and staying current with your blog. Congratulations, also, on all the recent publications.Alan Bandyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09631479580408195078noreply@blogger.com