tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13840519.post5984526120489626770..comments2024-03-27T03:32:53.817-05:00Comments on Euangelion: Josephus, Jesus, and MessiahMichael F. Birdhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09713482855679578651noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13840519.post-38107072697052621482009-01-04T09:01:00.000-06:002009-01-04T09:01:00.000-06:00Those without access to NTS might be interested in...Those without access to <I>NTS</I> might be interested in a paper Whealey delivered at SBL in 2000 which can be read online (linked on <A HREF="http://pace.mcmaster.ca/York/york/conference2000-ext.htm" REL="nofollow">this page</A>).<BR/><BR/>FWIW!<BR/><BR/>David ReimerDavid Reimerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17886492671751634816noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13840519.post-22912972998624188642009-01-03T17:05:00.000-06:002009-01-03T17:05:00.000-06:00Doug,I agree, it's a good well rounded discussion ...Doug,<BR/>I agree, it's a good well rounded discussion by Meier. I'd basically modify Meier's view that "He was the Messiah" is an interpolation to a scribal ammendment on some "Messiah" reference in Josephus.Michael F. Birdhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09713482855679578651noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13840519.post-554532581722833902009-01-03T17:01:00.000-06:002009-01-03T17:01:00.000-06:00I like the discussion in Meier's Marginal JewI like the discussion in Meier's Marginal JewDoughttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10326403777027937887noreply@blogger.com