To give an example, I point to one of the texts in NDIEC 9.36-37 which mentions a king being in the "image" of Zeus:
"great [Hephaestus,] king like [the Sun, great king of the up]per and lower regions, [child of the Benefactor gods,] of whom Hephaestrus appr[oved to whom the sun gave his po]wer, living image of Ze[us, son of the Sun]". Text is dated ca. 221-25 BC from Egypt. While theologians debate what it means to be in the "image of God" the designation was a royal title in ANE literature and to attribute it to humanity, as happens in Genesis 1 and 9, is perhaps to say no more than humanity is royal in God's eyes.
Also, the Society for the Study of Early Christianity is having its annual conference on "The Paradoxes of Paul" and keynote speakers include Judith Lieu and Beverly Gaventa in Sydney on 8 May 2009.
2 comments:
The image as royalty idea is the immediate context in Gen 1.26 and 28.
Jim
Mike,
The date for the SSEC Conference is actually 9th May, despite their website saying 8th. I hope they will correct this soon.
Post a Comment